GUIDELINE A-010
ACADEMIC PROPOSALS
SUBJECT: Submitting Proposals for New Academic
Programs or Units, and for Modifications of Existing Academic Programs,
Policies, or Units
I. DEVELOPING ACADEMIC PROPOSALS
A. LETTERS OF INTENT: Submitting a Letter of Intent is the first step for any program
proposal that requires approval from both TBR and THEC (See THEC policy A1:0
and A1:1). The Letters of Intent must include the following information:
1. A brief description of the nature, purpose, and
scope of the proposed action.
2. The projected date for submission of the full proposal and the target date
for Board
approval.
3. The projected date for implementation of the proposed program.
4. The online delivery mode
(if applicable) and,
5. A statement of the total estimated cost for the first year of the program
and the
anticipated source of funding that will support the program
over a long-term period.
In addition to the above requirements, all TBR
institutions in Middle Tennessee (community colleges and universities) must
include a statement in the Letter of Intent of how the institution will conduct
a desegregation impact analysis and ensure that the proposed program will be in
compliance with the Consent Decree (Section V). The results of the impact
analysis must be provided in the proposal.
Once written approval to proceed has been received by
the President, the institution can then develop the proposal. A copy of
the approval letter can serve as a cover letter for the proposal when it is
submitted.
B. PROPOSAL FORMS
The following forms have been developed to assist the
institution and to assure that the Board has the information it needs to review
a proposal properly. The response should be tailored to meet the particular
needs of the action being proposed. If an area is not applicable the
response can be “NA.” Listed below are the various actions that require
approval of the Board or the
FORMS
IDENTIFICATION
The
following forms are available on the TBR Academic Affairs webpage for
“Publications and Forms” (http://www.tbr.state.tn.us/academic_affairs/aapub.htm). Since
forms may be revised by TBR staff as needed, all proposals should be developed
using forms obtained directly from the website to insure that the most current
format has been submitted.
1. COVER – Required for all proposals.
This provides the President’s signature indicating that the proposal is supported
and has been approved through the institution’s curriculum review process.
2. SUM (Summary) – Required for all proposals.
The summary should be no more than two (2) pages, excluding attachments.
3.
PS (Program Structure)
4. PJ
(Performance and Justification)
5. SE (Student Enrollment Projections)
6.
FP (Financial Projections)
7.
CL (Collaborative Programs)
8.
PC (Program Change or Creation of a new academic unit)
9.
OCS (Extension of an existing degree program to an Off Campus Site)
10. OD (Online delivery) if applicable
PROPOSED ACTION AND REQUIRED FORMS
(Add Form
CL for all proposed collaborative programs.)
Establish
a New Academic Degree: COVER, SUM, PS, PJ, SE, FP
Establish
a New Certificate Program: COVER, SUM, PS, PJ, SE, FP
Establish
a New Concentration: COVER, SUM, PS, PJ, SE, FP
Consolidate an Existing Academic Program: COVER, SUM, PC
Converting on-ground program to a fully online delivery
format: COVER, SUM, OD
Substantive
Curriculum Modification: COVER, SUM, PC (affecting 18 credit hours
or more since the program was originally proposed or last modification
approved, or to increase required hours for a degree that results in more than
60/120)
Termination,
Inactivation, or Reactivation:
COVER, SUM, PC
Revision of admission, retention, and/or graduation
policy:
COVER, SUM, PC
Extending an
Academic Degree to an Off-Campus Site: COVER, SUM, OCS (Also
include forms PJ, SE, and FP if new costs are created by the extension.)
Revision of
Admissions Policy (see Guideline A-015).
Reorganization resulting in a new academic unit (i.e.,
department, school, on campus center, institute, bureau, or college) COVER,
SUM, PC (If new costs are anticipated, the FP form must also be submitted.)
C. SUBMITTING THE
PROPOSAL
1. Number
of copies - Submit one copy of the proposal electronically, and one (1)
paper copy with the President’s signature, to the Vice Chancellor for Academic
Affairs
2. Binding
- Proposals should NOT be bound or stapled. Forms should be separated with one
page of colored paper.
3. Review
Calendar
The submission of a proposal should be carefully planned in order to assure
timely staff review and Board consideration -- and, as may be required, THEC
review and consideration. In doing so, the following considerations are
relevant:
(a) The TBR considers academic proposals for new
degree programs at each of its quarterly meetings; the THEC, on the other hand,
considers academic proposals only at its Winter
(January) and Summer (July) meetings.
(b) The number of proposals received at any one time
may determine whether or not the staff review of a particular proposal is
completed in time for submission to the TBR at the desired time. Proposals are
generally reviewed on a first-come basis. Should the review of a proposal not
be completed in time for the next meeting of the Board, it will be carried over
with priority to the subsequent meeting.
(c) The following schedule may serve as a general
guide for all proposed academic actions other than for the establishment of new
degree programs. For proposed new degree programs, a timeline should be
discussed with TBR staff and will be addressed in the letter to the President
granting approval to develop the proposal after the Letter of Intent has been
submitted. Proposed new graduate degree programs will require
considerably more time than undergraduate degree program proposals.
Proposals will be accepted on a continual basis.
Proposals (other than degree programs) received by 15th of each
month (except December) will typically be reviewed by the end of the month and
summaries prepared for consideration by the Board through the 30-day review
process. Approval by the
4. A-010 Status Reports
The staff attempts to keep the
institutions apprised of the status of their proposals in a variety of ways
including direct conversations and quarterly A-010 Reports. Actions approved by
the Board will be communicated through the A-010 Report that will be sent
electronically to Presidents and Chief Academic Officers.
Source: March 5, 1976 meeting. Revised December 12,
1980 TBR meeting; November 8, 1982, May 29, 1984, February 10, 1987, and
February 14, 1989 Presidents Meeting, Presidents Meeting, February, 2003,
Presidents Meeting, May 20, 2003, Presidents Meeting, February 7, 2006.